In an odd tree a promoted leaf skips the level where it had no partner, so its proof is shorter. Today you handle proofs under the odd-node rule.
Generate and verify a proof for a promoted leaf in an odd-sized tree.
The Prove walk you already wrote handles this correctly, but it is worth seeing why.
In the three-leaf tree, carol at index 2 is the odd node at level 0: it has no
sibling, so it is promoted to level 1 with no proof step recorded. Up at level 1
it finally has a partner - the HashNode(alice, bob) subtree on its left - which
becomes its single proof step. So its proof is one hash, not two.
Verification does not care that the proof is shorter. It hashes carol, sees one step
with the sibling on the left, computes HashNode(0xebb8e925, HashLeaf("carol")), and
lands exactly on the root 0xb019c95a. The promote rule stays invisible to the
verifier because a promoted node contributes nothing at its lonely level - the path
just has one fewer rung. Odd trees prove membership just as cleanly as even ones.
// three leaves: level 0 = [La, Lb, Lc], level 1 = [HashNode(La,Lb), Lc]// leaf 2 (Lc) has no sibling at level 0 -> promoted, no step recorded.// at level 1 it pairs (on the right) with HashNode(La,Lb)=0xebb8e925 on the left.proof := tree.Prove(2) // [{0xebb8e925, false}]